Cricinfo England

Cricinfo Registration

home Slogout Game Fantasy Cricinfo 3D Video Games Audio Help and Feedback



England


News

Features

Photos

Fixtures

County Cricket 2008

2008 Statistics

Domestic Teams

Domestic History

Players/Officials

Grounds

Records

Web Links



 

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation
India v England
Sth Africa v Bangladesh
Pakistan v West Indies
Australia v New Zealand
Zimbabwe v Sri Lanka
Champions Twenty20
Indian Cricket League
Current and Future Tours
News
Photos | Wallpapers
Cricinfo Magazine
Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings
Wisden Almanack
Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout
Daily Newsletter
Toolbar
Widgets



Backing for controversial umpire

Willey welcomes Hair recall

Cricinfo staff

April 8, 2008


Peter Willey: "If the technology that they use on the TV is 100% accurate, I would say use the TV. But I don't think it is 100% accurate" © Getty Images
 

Peter Willey, the chairman of the umpires' association, has admitted he is pleased to see Darrell Hair restored to the ICC's elite panel. Hair was removed from the elite panel in the aftermath of The Oval Test in 2006 but the ICC have now welcomed him back into the fold.

"I think everyone felt for Darrell as an umpire really," he said. "He did what he thought was right. He wasn't backed up and he paid the price. I am glad he has come back, I hope he does well and has a long future as a Test umpire. I've always found him an honest man and a good umpire. He is a strong umpire. Some people don't like that."

Willey, a former England batsman who went on to umpire in 25 Tests, also defended umpires in general, adding that TV replays were putting them under increasing pressure.

"When I finished, all this technology was just coming in and you've got the added pressure of, every time you go in the middle, of everything being dissected in super slow-motion. People forget you've got a split-second to give an honest decision.

"If the technology that they use on the TV is 100% accurate, I would say use the TV. But I don't think it is 100% accurate. There are loads of things they can't pick up. I don't agree with Hawkeye. I don't think it gives a very honest description of where the ball pitches or is going. On certain pitches, you pitch the ball in the same spot and one delivery will go up and one will go down so, how they can predict where the ball will go, I just don't know.

"Then there is the case of bat-pad appeals. They tried it out a competition in South Africa a few years ago. Batsmen were asked to give an honest opinion on six bat-pad catches and every time the TV got it wrong. It is very difficult, even in slow motion, to decide whether the ball has hit the bat or not."

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
The Cricinfo Quiz - India v England special edition just launched
Test your knowledge
    Live scores, news & ball-by-ball commentary on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile
    Fantasy cricket: India v England, Australia v NZ & SA v Bangladesh
Enter your teams now



Related Links



Stories

Players/Umpires

Teams






Cricinfo Products
Fantasy: Ind v Eng, Aus v NZ & SA v Bangladesh
Enter your teams now
Scores, text comms & news on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile
The Cricinfo Quiz - India v England edition
Take the challenge now
Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now
Portable apps for your site
 
Sponsored Links
The best online rugby coverage - Scrum.com
Site just re-launched
09 Cricinfo Guide to International Cricket
Order now at Cricshop
Bet now on the India v England ODI series
Fixed odds at bet365
 


 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories